2015 student movement

In my opinion the strike focuses on internal demands of University  but it is possible that everything that is happening in the country (educational reform, teaching career, repression, etc.) may strike already become a national context.

There are schools that are in poor condition compared to other faculties, it is why you are calling for change and transparency in the budget of the university. In addition some schools have problems with authoritarian systems (Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism) from their authorities. How to participate in strikes it is part of the activities to learn and take charge of our own decision to be clear about the reason for the strikes and go marching down our demands.

The benefits expected internally is that having a satisfactory respusta rectory (the most necessary and urgent demands are met) and that the government does not continue with practices already known how to make reforms, laws, etc. without key players, in this case, teachers, students and technical education.

The drawback of strikes is that we are in a system that is overtaking us, comrades who are not informed of the reason for the strike or participate in activities and less of the marches.

If we think about the internal demands of university in my opinion for rectory and vicerectoria it affects them directly stop the administration of the university, so take tower 15 is always a good option.

Thinking about the national context visible student and teachers demands  will help the whole country hears the bad government practices that will result in lower approval and union of all citizens becoming student demands in social demands.

Regards!